This is a standards map for the concept of distinguishing among fact, opinion, and reasoned judgement in a text. It is specific to Standard 8 of the Range of Reading & Level of Text Complexity Anchor in the Literacy Reading in History/Social Studies Subjects standards of the CCSS ELA standards.
Distinguish among fact, opinion, and reasoned judgment in a text.
Content | Skills | Learning Targets | Big Ideas | Essential Questions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Text
|
2 - Distinguish (Among fact in a text)
2 - Distinguish (Among opinion in a text)
2 - Distinguish (Among reasoned judgment in a text)
|
2 - I can distinguish among fact in a text.
2 - I can distinguish among opinion in a text.
2 - I can distinguish among reasoned judgment in a text.
|
A. With facts, reasonable people either all agree or all disagree.
B. With reasoned judgment, more than one standard of judgment exists and can be debated.
C. With opinion, a matter is equally reasonable for one or equally rejected by another.
D. Distinguishing fact, opinion, and reasoned judgment in text validates knowledge.
|
A.1 How can author's use of fact influence a text's message?
B.1 How can author's use of reasoned judgment influence a text's message?
C.1 How can author's use of opinion influence a text's message?
D.1 Why distinguish fact from reasoned judgment or opinion?
|
Assess the extent to which the reasoning and evidence in a text support the author’s claims.
Content | Skills | Learning Targets | Big Ideas | Essential Questions |
---|---|---|---|---|
5 - Assess (The extent to which the reasoning in a text support the author’s claims.)
5 - Assess (The extent to which the evidence in a text support the author’s claim)
|
5 - I can assess the extent to which the reasoning in a text support the author’s claims.
5 - I can assess the extent to which the evidence in a text support the author’s claim.
|
A. Reasoning and sufficient evidence support validity of an author's claim.
|
A.1 How do reasoning and evidence affect the textual support of an author's claim?
|
Evaluate an author’s premises, claims, and evidence by corroborating or challenging them with other information.
Content | Skills | Learning Targets | Big Ideas | Essential Questions |
---|---|---|---|---|
5 - Evaluate (An author’s premises by corroborating them with other information)
5 - Evaluate (An author’s claims by corroborating them with other information)
5 - Evaluate (An author’s evidence by corroborating them with other information)
5 - Evaluate (An author’s premises by challenging them with other information)
5 - Evaluate (An author’s claims by challenging them with other information)
5 - Evaluate (An author’s evidence by challenging them with other information)
|
5 - I can evaluate an author’s premise by corroborating them with other information.
5 - I can evaluate an author’s claim by corroborating them with other information.
5 - I can evaluate an author’s evidence by corroborating them with other information.
5 - I can evaluate an author’s premises by challenging them with other information.
5 - I can evaluate an author’s claims by challenging them with other information.
5 - I can evaluate an author’s evidence by challenging them with other information.
|
A. Corroborating information in a text source will help in evaluating an author's purpose.
B. Challenging information in a text source will help in evaluating an author's purpose.
|
A.1 How does corroborating an author's purpose strengthen/weaken other text's validity?
B.1 How does challenging an author's purpose strengthen/weaken other text's validity?
|
Be the first to comment below.
Please enter a Registration Key to continue.